The Occupy protestors have been camped outside the beautiful St. Paul's Cathedral for two months now. Their post has caused quite a controversy in London. The city has tried desperately to evict the protestors, causing discord among the St. Paul's clergy and even prompting the cannon chancellor of St Paul's Cathedral Reverend Dr Giles Frase to resign because he didn't want to see the protestors removed by force. He soon became the poster child for the movement, prompting a discussion on "ethical capitalism" that never really caught on.
The protestors were issued an eviction notice for last week. However, they refused to move and now will become embroiled in a months-long legal battle over their encampment.
Anyway, in search of a "human interest" story for my reporting class I tagged along with a classmate who was headed to St. Paul's to speak with some protestors who she thought might have an interesting story. I was excited. I hadn't spent much time around the Occupy Movement and I was very excited to hear what these people had to say.
However, I was very disappointed by what I saw: the anti-capitalist protestors dodging into Starbucks for their morning coffee to charge up their Mac and Toshiba laptops, others sneaking home to take proper showers in clean flats. Are they so entrenched in the capitalistic society that they can't even recognise themselves as the products of the very idea they wish to abolish?
Speaking of "ideas," the protestors have adopted Guy Fawkes as the symbol of their anti-capitalist movement. The protestors can be seen wearing Guy Fawkes masks (like V wears in V for Vendetta). But as far as I can remember, V knew a thing or two about protesting and inspiring a revolution. You have to have an idea you believe is better than what the current establishment supports. Of those protesting, few can articulate anything beyond that they are "anti-capitalism" and seek to "reform the banks." What does that even mean? They don't know, so don't ask further questions.
The majority, and I do not mean all, only most, have not thought about what they are protesting and how they plan to bring about reform. It's a real shame because they have supposedly been living in tents for two months to make a point, a point that they cannot intelligently support. Even their sympathisers are losing interest in their plight because they have so obviously failed to come up with any sort of idea or reformative plan.
Then, as we were eating our dinner at Pizza Express, which is directly across from Tent City, we noticed three protestors casually walk into this national pizza chain and sit down for dinner. Midway through our dinner we saw a crowd gather around a Waitrose truck parked outside the restaurant. Onlookers said a female protestor had thrown herself under the truck and refused to move. When the ambulance arrived she jumped up and ran away.
I agree massive reform needs to take place, but if these are the people leading the movement then I'm afraid I've really lost faith.
I thought I was one of the few who didn't really understand exactly what the Occupiers were protesting; but, I guess if they don't undertand either, I won't feel so uninformed!!
ReplyDeleteThis is a good article. At least it gets a little more in-depth about the protestors' impact.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/reigniting_a_new_political_imagination/